Ed Parnell's Cunning Plan

I been here and there with receding hair…

Why is the universe made of matter?: Not up to Standard | The Economist

leave a comment »

THAT the universe is made of matter is obvious enough. What bothers fundamental physicists, though, is why that is. The best current theory of particle physics, called the Standard Model, suggests that basically equal amounts of matter and antimatter should have been produced in the Big Bang. Famously, however, matter and antimatter annihilate on contact and disappear in a puff of pure energy, so a primordial equity between the two would have led to a lifeless, photon-filled universe. One possible reason for the apparent imbalance is a phenomenon called charge conjugation/parity violation (or CP violation for short).

If charge conjugation and parity were conserved, nature would treat particles and their antiversions, which carry the opposite electric charge and opposite value of a property called spin, alike. The Standard Model allows for a whiff of CP violation. But that is nowhere near enough of it to explain matter’s cosmic dominance.

Last November an experiment called LHCb, which feeds off the world’s biggest particle accelerator, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) near Geneva, saw hints of excess CP violation beyond theorists’ predictions. Now an experiment in America, known as CDF, has spotted something similar. It announced its results at a meeting in La Thuile, in Italy.

Like LHCb, CDF was looking at a subatomic species called mesons. These come in a variety of types, or flavours, each containing a quark and an antiquark. One flavour, known as D0-mesons, is composed of a charm quark and an up antiquark. Its antimatter twin, known as D0-bar, consists of a charm antiquark and an up quark. (A charm quark is a heavier cousin of the up quark which, together with down quarks, makes up the ordinary protons and neutrons found in atomic nuclei; lest things get too straightforward, the down quark is not simply an up antiquark.)

via Why is the universe made of matter?: Not up to Standard | The Economist.

Advertisements

Written by edparnell

March 3, 2012 at 12:02 am

Posted in Science, Space

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: